Making Sense of Things

Thinking back to my “spiritual phase” a few years ago, I’m shocked at the proportion of gurus I took an interest to who turned out to be abusers, or at the very least, dangerously misleading snake oil salesmen. Rajneesh, Mooji, and Nithyananda lead (or led) toxic, controlling cults. Byron Katie and Esther and Jerry Hicks teach victim blaming and denial. Of course, there’s Teal Swan. And now, the Shambhala/Vajradhatu lineage holders: Chogyam Trungpa, Osel Tendzin, and Osel Mukpo, all of whom have been accused of terrible abuse and sexual misconduct.

In my last post from over a year ago, I wrote this:

A part of me wants to find a way to distinguish Trungpa’s actions from true spiritual abuse. I want this to be different. Of course I do. I got my degree at his school, and it was a wonderful experience. Becoming disillusioned with a respected teacher can be earth-shattering, and I would hate write anything that might hurt any of my friends, teachers, or fellow community members. I feel the need to say that, judging by my short time at Naropa, I’m confident that the amount of people Chogyam Trungpa has uplifted and inspired far outnumbers the people he has hurt. 

I cannot stand by this statement anymore. Not after reading these harrowing stories by Leslie Hays, one of Trungpa’s “spiritual wives.” Not after learning about how Osel Tendzin, Trungpa’s Vajra Regent, knowingly carrying AIDS, continued having unprotected sexual encounters with students after a conversation with Trungpa convinced him that nothing could go wrong, that he could “change the karma.” Not after realizing that there is an epidemic of sexual abuse and misogyny in Shambhala that appears to originate with Trungpa himself, his loose attitude toward sexual boundaries and disregard for consent. Maybe he has helped more people than he has harmed, but the damage he and his successors have done is egregious. I have no choice but to conclude that Shambhala is a cult, and a part of me is angry at everyone who’s worked to convince me otherwise. I’m angry for the victims, and I’m angry for the students and practitioners who were never told the full story.

Escaping Teal Swan’s influence was difficult, but I’m grateful that I know better now. Eventually, after a year or so of blankness and confusion, my disillusionment gave way to the realizations that guide me today–that hierarchical institutions will never lead us to their promised goals of oneness, “enlightened society,” or utopia because their organizational structures are irreconcilable with those goals.

Patriarchal, misogynistic structures will reproduce the sickness of patriarchy and misogyny. (Shocking, I know.) Organizations that demand financial sacrifice and free or underpaid labor will reproduce class oppression and economic disparity. There are groups whose ideologies center equality as a hidden universal truth, yet deny the significance of systemic inequality in the real world, groups who preach essential sameness and who view the melting away of distinctions and the blurring of dualities as signs of spiritual attainment, yet worship all-powerful, divinely appointed leaders who give lectures while perched on thrones. Organizations like this will allow abuse to occur under their noses because they won’t be able to recognize it, let alone correct it.

The sad thing is, many turn to spirituality as an escape from these oppressive forces. Although I didn’t understand this at the time, I first began turning inward at age 18 because I felt overwhelmed and incapable of navigating this complex, alienating, late capitalist world where nothing seemed to make any sense. Uncomfortable with the competitiveness and aggression I was told I needed in order to succeed by any conventional measure, I rejected the status quo and sought presence and peace instead. But I fell into the ultimate trap. Unshakeable inner peace is a very enticing product, and I was an eager consumer. And in a world full of precarity and upheaval, achieving peace means tuning out reality.

I turned to spirituality to escape alienation, but it didn’t work. Now I have found new meaning by facing oppression head-on in the broader world and in my community. I’ve had positive experiences with spiritual communities since leaving Teal’s cult behind, but a part of me felt that I was forcing myself back into something I wasn’t ready for. The time wasn’t right then, and it may never be, and that’s okay. My belief systems were completely broken down in 2016, and I felt like the ground had fallen out from under me. It takes a while to recover from an experience like that. But my story makes sense now, at least it does to me.

I realize that I’m one of the lucky ones. Not everyone is able to look back and say it was all worth it, that it led them to better things. I wish I could promise to fight for everyone less fortunate than me, but I know it’s impossible. In this moment, strangely, I understand the impulse to pray.

May all beings have happiness and the causes of happiness. 
May all beings be free from suffering and the causes of suffering. 
May all beings rejoice in the well-being of others. 
May all beings live in peace, free from greed and hatred.


Crazy Wisdom, Uncomfortable Questions

The Party

Image result for snowmass vajradhatuIn 1975 during a seminary in Snowmass, Colorado, respected Tibetan Buddhist teacher Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche, founder of Naropa University, and originator of Shambhala Buddhism, hosted a Halloween party. Two attendees, a couple named William Merwin and Dana Naone, mingled for a bit before retiring early for the night. According to witnesses, Trungpa was irritated that the couple had left early, and he ordered his followers to bring them back to the party “at any cost,” but William and Dana refused to return. According to one witness, negotiations between the guru and the couple went on for a few hours. An angry crowd of partygoers gathered outside their door, threatening them and attempting to break into their room. Tensions escalated until a chair was thrown through the glass balcony door in an attempt to force them out. 

William and Dana were then escorted down to the party by Trungpa’s guards. Their guru reprimanded them, directed racially-charged remarks toward Dana, and threw a glass of sake in William’s face. Then, they were asked to remove their clothes. When they refused, Trungpa ordered the guards to do it for them. They were stripped naked as Dana screamed for help, begging for someone to call the police. No one did. When another attendee tried to intervene, witnesses say that Trungpa punched him in the face. Dana alleged that Trungpa repeatedly hit the man who was stripping her because he was taking too long.

William and Dana were not the first attendees to be stripped that night. A woman named Persis McMillen had been forced out of her costume by the guards earlier in the evening, and was left feeling violated, “sick,” and “really trashed out.” An attendee named Jack Niland had also been targeted by Trungpa. The guards removed his clothes and threw him into a pool. 

Once William and Dana were fully disrobed, the couple held each other, helpless and exposed. William Merwin allegedly implored, “Why us? Why are we the only two people in this room standing here naked in front of you?” So, the other guests removed their clothing, too. At Trungpa’s behest, the dancing resumed, as if nothing had happened.

“Compassion takes many forms.”

William Merwin, Dana Naone, and several witnesses were interviewed about the Halloween stripping incident. Here are some comments from those interviews:

“[All] of a sudden [Trungpa] was a Mahakala, he was a wrathful deity…I really regretted getting so stoned, because I did realize something very powerful and potent was going on.”

Powerful and potent. Seeing two desperate people forcibly stripped naked.

“I’d never heard anyone call [Trungpa] names before. Insults. I’d never heard that—I was shocked.”

What was more shocking? Merwin’s backtalk, or Trungpa’s assault?

“Then Dana was standing there. perfectly pretty girl. no scars. everyone’s wondering, does she have scars or something?”

Of course. Why else would she resist being stripped naked, if not to hide some physical imperfection?

“The next thing after that I remember is that Merwin and Dana are standing together. facing Rinpoche, just completely huddled around each other. (They are nude.) Very beautiful. Adam and Eve…The whole thing, just visually, was very elegant somehow.”

Beautiful. Elegant. Elegant.

“[After the incident, Merwin and Naone] were talking about the invasion of their privacy. And the brutality, and the violence. And they were just appalled…I was trying to say, ‘well, vajrayana teachings were ruthless; compassion takes many forms.’ And they had some rapid fire answer to every statement, which in one way or another defended their sense of ‘self’—their sense of propriety. It was impenetrable.”

Those damn victims and their stubborn, impenetrable senses of self.

“[Merwin] was on the trip that he was perfectly correct in his behavior and Rinpoche blew it, that he was just human. He said ‘Rinpoche really made a fool of himself last night, didn’t he?’ This guy didn’t get it at all.”

I don’t get it, either. I’m sorry. I do not fucking get it.

Even more disturbing are poet Allen Ginsberg’s comments on the incident:

“In the middle of that scene, [for Dana] to yell ‘call the police’—do you realize how vulgar that was? The wisdom of the East being unveiled, and she’s going ‘call the police!’ I mean, shit! Fuck that shit! Strip ‘em naked, break down the door! Anything—symbolically”

Maybe it’s just me, but I have a bit of trouble seeing the “symbolic” spiritual value of a physical assault. I don’t want to see it. I won’t subscribe to a belief system that recontextualizes its leader’s abuse as a subversive teaching or dismisses his victims’ cries for help as ignorance or “vulgarity.” To me, this act of physical violence could only symbolize spiritual violence, in which the seekers’ self-esteem, their egos, are stripped and abused against their will. What can this sort of wrathful spiritual teaching accomplish, besides leaving scars of trauma?

Where these witnesses saw elegance, power, divine wrath, a couple of stubborn egos clashing with the wisdom of their revered leader, I see victim blaming, spiritual bypassing, and a room full of complicit people. I wonder where they are now, and whether they ever think about the incident. Whether they ever considered their own roles in the violence. 

Crazy, huh?

Image result for chogyam trungpaI was a student at Naropa University. Unsurprisingly, this story was left out of all my class discussions about Trungpa’s wild behavior. That he drank excessively, that he married a sixteen-year-old female student at age thirty, and that he had consensual sexual relations with students, I knew. And in hindsight, I’m embarrassed that I overlooked the troubling power dynamics of those intimate relationships. But as far as I can recall, it was never let on that Trungpa had ever displayed violent or overtly abusive behavior, which made his outrageous ways seem benign. As students, we respected his unconventional life and teaching style. After all, Trungpa was widely recognized as a great teacher, one of the primary figures to popularize Tibetan Buddhism in the West. Not only that, but he hailed from a tradition that embraces “crazy wisdom” and sees symptoms of madness as possible signs of spiritual attainment. The Tantric siddhas of ancient Tibet and India behaved in transgressive ways because they had transcended the dualism of worldly values, of right and wrong. They were perceived as mad by the world because the world was truly insane. And Chogyam Trungpa was following in their footsteps.

When I first learned about the concept of crazy wisdom, I was still a follower of Teal Swan. I immediately noticed that she resembled a Tantric siddha in some ways—she exhibited controversial behavior, contradicted herself, and transgressed spiritual norms by addressing taboo subjects and embracing the darker, messier aspects of life. That was what drew me to her, and my learned tolerance to her “quirks”—her grandiosity, her victim mentality, and a hundred other red flags I overlooked—clouded my judgement. Behaviors that would normally have been considered warning signs earned her praise for her authenticity and transparency, or were reframed as signs of wisdom. She said that she was a “spiritual revolutionary” and I believed her. She was different. Unlike other gurus, she refused to conceal her own flaws, her humanity. So, sometimes, she was confusing. That was all part of the teaching. Chogyam Trungpa’s followers rationalized his actions at the Halloween party in ways that closely mirrored some of my own excuses for Teal Swan’s imperfections.

Contemplating Trungpa’s violent behavior within the context of the “crazy wisdom” tradition, I find myself in the same position I was in last year, facing the unsettling realization that Teal Swan’s “authenticity movement” was, ironically, nothing more than a “get out of jail free” card for her dishonesty. I can see how my faith in crazy wisdom (or, at least, some warped version of it) once impaired my decision making and made me susceptible to cult-like manipulation tactics. Now, since learning about the incident in Snowmass, I find myself wondering how crazy wisdom could be compatible with discernment and rational, critical thought at all. 

When the goal is to break through the conditioned mind, moral codes and socially enforced concepts of acceptable behavior are seen as attachments to be released. They may even be reduced to obstacles on the spiritual path. Naturally, this is reflected in the behavior of crazy wisdom gurus, which traditionally appears erratic, amoral, even vulgar, to outsiders. But how can we distinguish wisdom from nonsense and tough love from abuse within this framework? We surrender our preconceptions of right and wrong, and only the guru has the authority to correct our understanding. And that is an enormous amount of trust to place in a fallible, human being. The very definition of “right” expands to include everything the guru does.

When Tilopa slapped Naropa in the face with his shoe, the disciple’s mind was liberated. One Zen story tells of a master who slammed the door on an aspiring monk’s leg, breaking his bone and bringing him to enlightenment simultaneously. In another tale, the legendary 500 year old saint Mahavatar Babaji demanded that an aspiring disciple prove his commitment by jumping off of a cliff. He jumped, and the saint brought him back to life and accepted him as his student.

I don’t know what to make of these stories anymore.

“He was being so physically brutal…”

A part of me wants to find a way to distinguish Trungpa’s actions from true spiritual abuse. I want this to be different. Of course I do. I got my degree at his school, and it was a wonderful experience. Becoming disillusioned with a respected teacher can be earth-shattering, and I would hate write anything that might hurt any of my friends, teachers, or fellow community members. I feel the need to say that, judging by my short time at Naropa, I’m confident that the amount of people Chogyam Trungpa has uplifted and inspired far outnumbers the people he has hurt. Though I never felt a deep resonance with his teachings, I know that they have changed many, many lives for the better.

That doesn’t change my deep discomfort with Trungpa’s conduct. Personally, if it ever came to my attention that someone in my life had forcibly stripped off an innocent person’s clothes in front of a crowd, verbally abused and humiliated them, and punched anyone who got in the way, I would sever ties with them immediately. I wouldn’t be able to trust this person as a friend, let alone as a leader. Maybe it’s just me.

Image result for snowmass vajradhatuWhen I first learned of this incident, I was reminded of David Miscavige’s physical assaults on his staff and Sogyal Rinpoche’s violent tendencies, the only saving grace being that the Halloween party stripping debacle seemed to be an isolated incident. But one former follower, quoted in Stripping the Gurus by Geoffrey D. Falk, says, ”It is a typical incident, it is not an isolated example. At every seminary, as far as I know, there was a confrontation involving violence.”

Falk also quotes Stephen Butterfield, former student of Trungpa and author of The Double Mirror: A Skeptical Journey into Buddhist Tantra:

We were admonished … not to talk about our practice. “May I shrivel up instantly and rot,” we vowed, “if I ever discuss these teachings with anyone who has not been initiated into them by a qualified master.” As if this were not enough, Trungpa told us that if we ever tried to leave the Vajrayana, we would suffer unbearable, subtle, continuous anguish, and disasters would pursue us like furies….

To be part of Trungpa’s inner circle, you had to take a vow never to reveal or even discuss some of the things he did. This personal secrecy is common with gurus, especially in Vajrayana Buddhism. It is also common in the dysfunctional family systems of alcoholics and sexual abusers. This inner circle secrecy puts up an almost insurmountable barrier to a healthy skeptical mind….

[T]he vow of silence means that you cannot get near him until you have already given up your own perception of enlightenment and committed yourself to his.

Reading this, I can’t help but wonder how many similar incidents have been swept under the rug. Frighteningly, the dynamic Butterfield describes here is straight out of Rick Ross’s cult warning signs. This passage also strikes at the root of my confusion as a once-passionate but now deeply disillusioned spiritual seeker. The sort of extreme secrecy demanded by Trungpa is common in his tradition. And it could be used to protect the most sacred spiritual secrets, or to conceal the worst misconduct. At best, submission to the wisdom and authority of a spiritual teacher is the key to self-realization. At worst, it’s the beginning of years of abuse. How can seekers safely navigate such risky terrain? 

There’s another troubling quote from the Halloween party witness accounts that leads me to suspect that the stripping of Merwin and Naone wasn’t just an isolated boundary violation. Here, party attendee Barbara Meier describes an encounter she had with Trungpa at the party before the stripping incident took place:

I had a whole interchange with Rinpoche. I can’t remember the order. I think it must have happened before…he called me up to him. He saw me, and…we got into this whole thing. He was picking up on my costume. The whole aggression. (She was in costume as a biker.) We started sort of like making out. I mean it was very lavish, and all these people were dancing, and sitting around (laughs), and we just started doing this whole thing. And he was being so brutal. He was being so physically brutal, and like, clawing my arm, and just, biting my lip, just so vicious. And then he did this whole thing with my check (bit into the skin, leaving tooth marks), and I was in this state of mind—well, if that’s what he wants, that’s what I’ll give him too. And I just came back with it. And we’re in this intense, you know very tense….somebody else came up or something and I managed to get away. But it was very nonverbal, direct, powerful, intense brutal communication. I didn’t know what to make of it all. 

That Trungpa had a sexual encounter with a student in the middle of a crowded room isn’t particularly surprising. What really strikes me about this quote is the violence that Trungpa allegedly inflicted on her, and the cognitive dissonance I can sense in her words. She describes the encounter as consensual and says that she willingly reciprocated his intensity. But when she says that she “managed to get away,” and that she “didn’t know what to make of it all,” it’s clear that she also felt some confusion and discomfort. Given Trungpa’s power over her, would she have had the freedom to stop him? If she had had a choice, would she have let him leave toothmarks on her cheek? This was just an afterthought to the stripping scandal, only mentioned once. Does that mean this sort of conduct was considered normal?

Wisdom Does not Manifest as Abuse

Eschewing conventional moral standards, I nodded in agreement as I watched Teal bully her followers, partners, and friends. I continued to support her without a thought, the same way millions of people voted enthusiastically for Donald Trump after watching him mock a disabled reporter, insult prisoners of war and families of fallen soldiers, brag about sexual assault, hurl racist attacks at immigrants, etc., etc., etc. We abandon our normal sense of right and wrong when, in our desperate search for meaning, we feel that we have finally stumbled upon something better, something more pure and more right than society’s concept of morality. Seeing the pain and dysfunction and hypocrisy that permeates the dominant culture, we reject the norms that were prescribed to us, looking instead to some charismatic leader with the confidence and power to assign us a new truth. When controversy arises, it merely reinforces our faith in the beloved guru—They’re different, they’re ahead of their time, and most people just don’t understand them yet. We praise them for their fearless authenticity.

But here’s the thing. By turning a blind eye to the abuses of these leaders (or worse, reframing their abuses as virtues) we are allowing the patterns of oppression and subjugation that plague society as a whole—most likely, the very patterns that caused our disillusionment in the first place—to replicate within the spiritual world.

I don’t know how to feel about Chogyam Trungpa anymore. I don’t know whether I will ever feel comfortable looking up to anyone as a personal guru or spiritual leader again. But it’s okay that I don’t have all the answers right now. I just hope that, through my mistakes, and through these experiences of disappointment and disillusionment, I’ve gained the wisdom to recognize abuse when I see it, and to use my voice to uplift victims who need support in the face of spiritual bypassing, gaslighting, and denial.

As an unenlightened human entrapped by the so-called illusions of separation and dualism, my moral compass is all I have to help me determine what is good and true in this world. So, I reject the idea that greatness ever disguises itself as abuse.

Truth Tribe’s Questions for Teal

*Updated with a statement from Michael Brown! See bottom of page.*

I was recently contacted by Blake, Teal Swan’s right-hand man. He and Teal were planning to make a video addressing some of the allegations against her, he said, and he was wondering if I would consult with Truth Tribe and put together a list of questions we’d like to have answered.

Here is the full list of questions. I’m told that the video will only be about 15 minutes long, so there may not be time to answer a them all. Still, I’m very excited to see how they respond!

Your Past

At the beginning of your career, Blake posed as a journalist and wrote an article about you under a false identity. Can you explain why this decision was made?

You say that you rejected your extrasensory abilities after escaping the cult and that you only reclaimed your spirituality at age 25, but before age 25 you mentioned becoming a medium, being a Wiccan high priestess, and being a trained energy healer. How did your spiritual journey really unfold in your early adulthood?

Your old website said that you had lived in/traveled to New Zealand, Fiji, Rarotonga, Paris, Tokyo, Milan, Mexico, and Tahiti by 2005. How many of these countries did you actually live in?

You have mentioned that you were once a professional high fashion model. You have also claimed that you posed for Playboy. Are there any photos? What agency were you signed to?

You say that you were once sewn into a corpse for hours as a child. According to medical professionals, this is impossible. Can you explain this?

Mental Health and the Completion Process

You were recently cited and fined by the state of Utah for practicing therapy without a license. How will this affect your trained Completion Process facilitators? How will you prevent issues like this going forward?

What protocol do you have in place to help suicidal people in Teal Tribe? Do you still believe that “there is nothing that any healer could do for that type of vibration” when it comes to people with suicidal thoughts who feel hopeless?

Personal Relationships

In a blog post, Ale claimed that you pressured him to have kambo administered through burns to his forehead, but subsequent photos show no marks or scars. What really happened, and how do you justify coercing someone into having their face burned?

Last year, you posted an email from your ex-husband in Teal Tribe. In a later blog post, Ale edited this email from your ex to make it look like he was friends with a hit man and that your life was being threatened. We have screenshots of both of these posts and can prove that the information was changed. There have also been rumors that you have accused Ale’s ex-wife of hiring a hit man to kill you. Can you explain these claims?

It has recently come to light that Jordan Duchnycz coerced a former friend of yours named Tori into sex and later confessed to raping her. Did you recently remove Jordan’s animation from the intro to your Ask Teal videos because of this controversy? Do you plan on removing your frequency paintings on the Spirit Science website? Will you stop associating with Jordan and/or Spirit Science?

As a survivor yourself, how do you feel about Blake’s perspective that Tori wasn’t really raped, and that the assault was due to her “poor boundaries”? (In 2011, you wrote, “Individuals who come out with the truth about the abusive atrocities they have suffered run the risk of being discredited by a waiting society, who does not want to admit such things go on…Support from society for a victim of abuse alleviates much of the impact of the abuse whereas opposition in the form of discouragement, judgment, hostility or disbelief can compound the damage of the impact of the abuse catastrophically.”)


You say you were hired to address the UN about the refugee crisis, and you went on to say that “the Syrian refugees are not refugees” A witness says that your talk at the UN was on a different subject. Is there any record of your official UN speech on this crisis, or any staff/attendees who can verify that it happened? Have your views on the crisis changed?

In your frequency paintings, you have used symbols from the Necronomicon, Fullmetal Alchemist, and the Reiki healing method. Can you explain why those modern symbols appear in the vibrations that you depict? Do you think you would be able to replicate one of your paintings just by meditating on the vibration, without looking at the original?

Update: Teal “Answers to the Allegations;” Michael Brown Answers Back

Nearly three months later, Teal has released this video addressing her “haters'” concerns. Sort of. Unsurprisingly, she didn’t answer our questions. She did, however, compare herself to Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Einstein, and Tesla. See for yourself.

I was especially curious to see how Teal would explain her undeniable, well-documented plagiarism. Conveniently ignoring the countless instances of lazy copy-and-pasting that litter her blogs and articles, she zeroed in on the controversy over the originality of her Completion Process, saying:

They went to Michael Brown, who’s the creator of the Presence Process, so they reached out to him and they said ‘She’s stolen this process!’ And they got him all up in arms, and then he looked into it and there was nothing there, and he’s like ‘Oh, great.’ So he and I had a conversation and he’s like, ‘Yeah, all these yapping dogs basically called me and said that you stole this process and it’s nothing like my process and so, sorry that you’re going through such stuff,’ and we had a nice conversation. But, yet again, no claim. Because why? Because the Completion Process and the Presence Process have nothing in common except for the fact that they both promote the concept of sitting with emotions instead of escaping from emotions, and the concept that triggers…are remnants of the past. That’s the only thing they have in common. Yet, here we go with slander again.

So, according to Teal, Brown agrees that the two processes are completely different. They had a lovely conversation and are on great terms.

This statement from Michael Brown paints a very different picture.


“When Teal Swan’s management first contacted me, asking if we could engage on some level about the commonality of our work, or some other pretext like that, I brushed them off. I said something like ‘when people do explorations into themselves they likely find the same things…blah, blah, blah.’ When readers told me Teal Swan is plagiarizing The Presence Process, I wasn’t really interested. I do recall comparing such mutterings to, ‘yapping dogs.’ I apologize for that now. My initial flippant response is because I have heard exact sentences, verbatim from my own two books, come out of the mouths of many known New Age ‘teachers,’ and even celebrities like Jim Carey, Oprah and Ellen. Even my own friends do it to me, not realizing they are talking my book back at me. This is because The Presence Process is full of perceptual catch-phrases I created in the 90′ to communicate the intricacies of emotional processing, which have now become meaningless New Age memes. People love to use them to impress, especially when they have no experiential clue what they really imply. Some of these catch-phrases now appear on fridge magnets in New Age homes, always ascribed to some fake guru, like Teal Swan. The word ‘integration’, for example, was only used in the context of the business community before I added it to the vocabulary of emotional processing in the early 90’s. So I take people plagiarizing my work with a pinch of salt. However, Teal Swan does take it to a whole new level. Since my one and only interaction with Teal Swan, last year if I recall, Namaste Publishing Inc. has been contacted about this matter by others and did pass their documentation on to their legal advisers. I would encourage readers to contact them again if this matter concerns you. [Attention: Constance Kellough] I have not read Teal Swan’s recent book, or any of her writings, other than excerpts sent to me by concerned readers. So beyond what has been shown to me, I have no idea to what extent she copies anything by anybody. But I have seen her videos on you tube. Teal Swan is everything I hoped the writing of The Presence Process would protect people from. I guess I failed a bit here!!! As long as people confuse ‘taking their power’ with ‘following another despite their obvious inconsistencies’, the Teal Swans of the world will be here to rake in the cash and leave a wake of confusion and disappointment. The Presence Process is delicate, personal, self-facilitation, written in context and with extreme care. People using any part of it to gain followers are naive, reckless, irresponsible and ignorant. Or otherwise they are just power-hungry psychopathic narcissists.”

Michael Brown, author of The Presence Process and Alchemy Of The Heart.

Teal, is this slander, too?

Actually…don’t answer that.